New Delhi, Nov 5 (IANS) In order to enable easy access to its cost-effective business productivity software, Microsoft Thursday launched its online services in India.
Starting at $2 (about Rs.100) a month, the service will allow small and medium business and enterprise customers to access Microsoft’s e-mail, collaboration, conferencing and productivity capabilities online.
Customers can access the suite directly from www.microsoft.com/india/onlineservices and pay a use-based monthly subscription fee.
According to the company, savings are expected to be between 10 to 50 percent on IT costs.
HCL Infosystems, Infosys and Wipro are among the companies to market and offer value-added services around the Microsoft Online Services.
The launch is part of Microsoft’s Software Plus Services strategy that aims to provide flexibility and choice of accessing and using software both on premise and off the Internet or as a combination of both.
“In today’s competitive global market businesses need cost-effective technology that allows flexibility and adds value to their organisations,” said Microsoft Business Group president Stephen Elop in a statement.
The services will be available in India from Nov 7.
According to a study by global consultancy Browne and Mohan, the market for hosted email will grow at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 50 percent, with over 28 percent of email solutions to be run on the hosted model by 2012
Showing posts with label Galib PGDM III. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Galib PGDM III. Show all posts
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Court wonders if negotiation possible on Reliance gas dispute
New Delhi, Oct 27 (IANS) The Supreme Court Tuesday wondered if it was still possible for Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries and the Anil Ambani-led Reliance Natural Resources to negotiate a “suitable agreement” for gas supplies from the Krishna-Godavari basin.
“There must be parameters to arrive at suitable arrangements for supply of gas,” the Supreme Court observed as it resumed hearing the dispute for the fourth day over the supply and pricing of gas from Reliance Industries to Reliance Natural Resources.
“Either you negotiate or we can direct you to go for arbitration,” remarked the three-member bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice P. Sathasivam.
The observations came when the counsel for Reliance Industries Harish Salve resumed his arguments and continued to maintain that the Ambani family reorganisation pact had no bearing on his client, which was a company.
“Anything not approved by the board or shareholders is not part of the scheme. The board has the last word. There is no occasion to look beyond it,” contended Salve.
“The Reliance Industries board had no knowledge of the private agreement,” he said, while adding that a suitable arrangement as per the 2005 pact was not working.
According to him, a better and more suitable arrangement now was the gas utilization policy spelt out by the government. “But as per this policy, Reliance Industries is neither free to fix the price nor choose the buyer.”
These remarks prompted Ram Jethmalani to intervene on behalf of Reliance Natural, saying his client was not against the government’s gas utilisation policy, but it should be implemented prospectively and not retrospectively.
“It should not affect the existing agreement.”
Jethmalani also said Reliance Industries will make a profit of several thousand crores even if it sells gas at $2.34 per unit, as demanded by his client.
“It’s fraud on the nation. You (Reliance Industries) are making thousands of crores,” Jethmalani said, while accusing Salve of repeating the same arguments ad infinitum, which was “taxing his nerves”.
Salve shot back: “I am going to argue for another three days. You better relax till then.”
“There must be parameters to arrive at suitable arrangements for supply of gas,” the Supreme Court observed as it resumed hearing the dispute for the fourth day over the supply and pricing of gas from Reliance Industries to Reliance Natural Resources.
“Either you negotiate or we can direct you to go for arbitration,” remarked the three-member bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice P. Sathasivam.
The observations came when the counsel for Reliance Industries Harish Salve resumed his arguments and continued to maintain that the Ambani family reorganisation pact had no bearing on his client, which was a company.
“Anything not approved by the board or shareholders is not part of the scheme. The board has the last word. There is no occasion to look beyond it,” contended Salve.
“The Reliance Industries board had no knowledge of the private agreement,” he said, while adding that a suitable arrangement as per the 2005 pact was not working.
According to him, a better and more suitable arrangement now was the gas utilization policy spelt out by the government. “But as per this policy, Reliance Industries is neither free to fix the price nor choose the buyer.”
These remarks prompted Ram Jethmalani to intervene on behalf of Reliance Natural, saying his client was not against the government’s gas utilisation policy, but it should be implemented prospectively and not retrospectively.
“It should not affect the existing agreement.”
Jethmalani also said Reliance Industries will make a profit of several thousand crores even if it sells gas at $2.34 per unit, as demanded by his client.
“It’s fraud on the nation. You (Reliance Industries) are making thousands of crores,” Jethmalani said, while accusing Salve of repeating the same arguments ad infinitum, which was “taxing his nerves”.
Salve shot back: “I am going to argue for another three days. You better relax till then.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)